When to Capitalize vs Expense Payments Made

When to Capitalize vs Expense Payments Made

Oct 8, 2024
6 minute read

The decision should be based on whether the cost improves the asset vs merely restores the asset to its original operating condition. Capitalized payments create an asset on your balance sheet, while expensed payments reduce the net income on your income statement. In general, payments to purchase or repair fixed assets should be capitalized if the amount is material and the asset will generate a benefit to the company over multiple years.

CapitalizeExpense
  • Purchase of new assets: A fixed asset with a useful life of greater than one year should be capitalized.
  • Increase in useful life of an asset: Major overhauls and restorations are examples of costs that extend the useful life of an asset. Useful life might be increased by replacing old parts with newer parts or restoring its ability to operate through a series of repairs.
  • Increase in the number of units produced from the asset: Money spent to increase the output capacity of a fixed asset is a capital expenditure.
  • Change in the purpose of the asset: For instance, payments for converting a machine from producing one product to a different product must be capitalized.
  • Enhanced quality of units produced from the asset: For example, a printing press replaced the printhead of one of their large-scale printers. As a result, the newer printhead produces higher-quality printouts without streaks and with accurate color outputs.
  • Payments aren’t material: Small payments that aren't material to a company's overall financial results can be expensed, even if listed in the bullets about capitalizing costs. Under GAAP, materiality depends on the company's size, while the IRS allows a current deduction for payments under $2,500 for tax purposes. Learn more about the materiality principle.
  • The expense is merely an ordinary repair: Repairs and maintenance intended to keep the asset in good operating condition should be treated as expenses.
  • The expense improves only the aesthetic value of the asset: Improving the aesthetic value of the asset doesn’t require capitalization. Applying paint or coatings can be considered for aesthetic purposes only or for the necessary care required to protect the asset from deterioration or damage.

Effect of Capitalizing vs Expense Payments in the Income Statement

The issue of whether to capitalize an expense has an effect on the financial statements. Moreover, the gray areas of capitalization can also be a breeding ground for tax fraud or financial statement manipulation.

Let’s go over the effects on financial statements of capitalizing vs expensing a payment.

Ollivander Woodworks purchased a wood cutting machine intended for the production of wood furniture. The cost of this machine is $50,000, with a useful life of five years and no residual value. In the first year, the company paid a subsequent cost of $6,000. Obviously, the $50,000 purchase price must be capitalized.

Let’s look at the effect on the financial statements if we capitalize vs expense the $6,000 in subsequent costs. Assume the following income statement figures over the next five years if the $6,000 subsequent cost is capitalized along with the $50,000 purchase price.

Assuming the $6,000 payment was CAPITALIZED
 Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5
Net Income Before Depreciation$16,000$17,000$18,000$19,000$20,000
Depreciation Expense of Purchase Price($50,000 ÷ 5 years)($10,000)($10,000)($10,000)($10,000)($10,000)
Depreciation of Subsequent Cost($6,000 ÷ 5 years)($1,200)($1,200)($1,200)($1,200)($1,200)
Net Income$4,800$5,800$6,800$9,000$8,800
Advertisement

By capitalizing the expense, we avoided recording the full $6,000 expense in year 1. Instead, we spread the $6,000 payment over five years through depreciation. This resulted in a $1,200 depreciation expense per year, rather than a single $6,000 charge in the first year.

Now, let’s look at the effect of charging it to expense in year 1.

Assuming the $6,000 payment was CHARGED TO EXPENSE IN YEAR 1
 Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5
Net Income Before Depreciation & Subsequent Cost$16,000$17,000$18,000$19,000$20,000
Depreciation Expense of Purchase Price($50,000 ÷ 5 years)($10,000)($10,000)($10,000)($10,000)($10,000)
Subsequent Cost (expensed)($6,000)----
Net Income0$7,000$8000$9,000$10,000

In year 1, we charged the entire $6,000 to expense, which resulted in a net income of zero. Although it may look bad that we had no net income, let’s compare the net income under the two assumptions:

Net Income Comparison ― Capitalize vs Expense
 Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Total
(A) Net Income If Capitalized$4,800$5,800$6,800$7,800$8,800$34,000
(B) Net Income If Expense(0)$7,000$8,000$9,000$10,000$34,000
Net Effect (A − B)$4,800($1,200)($1,200)($1,200)($1,200)(0)

Notice that in year 1, our net income is $4,800 higher when we capitalize the asset cost compared to expensing it. In subsequent years, the difference reverses by $1,200 annually, which is the yearly depreciation if the cost is capitalized.

Regardless of whether we capitalize or expense the payment, the total income over the asset’s life remains the same. The income difference is only a temporary timing difference, as capitalizing spreads the expense over several periods.

Most companies prefer capitalizing for financial reporting purposes to avoid a significant drop in net income in year 1. However, for tax purposes, they often prefer expensing to benefit from immediate tax savings in the first year.

Our related resources:

Tax Savings in Capitalizing vs Expensing Payments

Capitalizing typically results in higher net income in the payment year, while expensing leads to lower net income in that same year. Hence, we expect to pay 1) higher taxes in the payment year when capitalizing the payment; and 2) lower taxes when expensing it right away in the payment year.

Advertisement

Assuming our tax rate is 20%, here are our tax savings and liabilities.

Net Income Comparison ― Capitalize vs Expense
 Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Total
(A) Net Income If Capitalized$4,800$5,800$6,800$7,800$8,800$34,000
(B) Net Income If Expense(0)$7,000$8,000$9,000$10,000$34,000
Net Effect (A − B)$4,800($1,200)($1,200)($1,200)($1,200)(0)
Tax Savings (Liability) if Expensed$960($240)($240)($240)($240)(0)

Expensing in Year 1 saves you $960 in taxes, while capitalizing increases your tax by $160. In later years, capitalizing provides $240 in tax savings annually, whereas expensing leads to a $240 tax liability each year. Over time, the total tax impact balances out, but capitalizing defers the savings to future years.

Journal Entries to Capitalize vs Expense Asset Payments

When we capitalize payments, we debit the payment to our fixed asset account. The payment will increase the balance of our asset account in the balance sheet. If we charge it to expense, we debit the payment to Repairs Expense. The effect of capitalizing would be a gradual transfer of the repairs and maintenance cost to profit and loss over years through depreciation.

CAPITALIZEEXPENSE
Equipment   Cash$6,000             $6,000Repairs Expense   Cash$6,000              $6,000

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is the difference between capitalize and expense?

Capitalization involves recording a cost as an asset on the balance sheet, allowing it to be spread over multiple future periods through depreciation or amortization. In contrast, an expense is a cost that’s immediately recognized on the income statement, impacting only the current period’s financial results.

When to capitalize or expense repairs?

Repairs should be capitalized if they increase the asset’s useful life, capacity, or quality, or if they involve a significant overhaul or change in purpose. On the other hand, repairs should be expensed if they are routine maintenance or improve only the asset’s appearance, or if the payment is relatively small and not material to the company’s overall financial results.

Bottom Line

Knowing when to capitalize vs expense a subsequent cost related to a fixed asset requires careful consideration. From an accounting perspective, the two options have no effect on overall net income over the life of the asset. However, there’s a difference in net income across years due to timing differences.

Eric Gerard Ruiz, CPA

Eric Gerard Ruiz, CPA

Accounting and Bookkeeping Expert at Fit Small Business

Eric Gerard Ruiz, a licensed CPA in the Philippines, specializes in financial accounting and reporting (IFRS), managerial accounting, and cost accounting. He has tested and review accounting software like QuickBooks and Xero, along with other small business tools. Eric also creates free accounting resources, including manuals, spreadsheet trackers, and templates, to support small business owners.

Fit Small Business Logo

Our mission is to provide small business owners with the information you need to succeed. Learn how to start, market, run, and grow your business today!

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.