The average cost method computes inventory cost based on total cost of purchases divided by the number of goods purchased. Since AVCO uses an average cost of goods in inventory, rather than tracking individual units, it’s simpler to use than first-in, first-out (FIFO) or last-in, first-out (LIFO). The main highlight of the average cost method is its ability to keep inventory costs at stable levels when prices are fluctuating.
Here’s the formula to compute the average unit cost:
Average Unit Cost | = | Total Cost of Purchases or Production Quantity Purchased or Produced |
Use Cases
Advantages & Disadvantages of the AVCO Method
ADVANTAGES | DISADVANTAGES |
---|---|
It evens out fluctuations in unit price | The average unit cost may not reflect current costs |
It is easier than FIFO and LIFO | It is suitable only for identical items |
The cost of inventory is consistent because it only uses one unit cost, unlike in FIFO and LIFO, where unit costs from different purchases can build up | It is prone to rounding errors, and unit costs always have rounding adjustments |
It is a widely accepted method not only in the United States but in many foreign countries | Extreme values may affect or skew the averages |
Understanding the Average Cost Method
To better understand this method, let’s experiment a bit by looking at three different price scenarios: rising prices, declining prices, and fluctuating prices. Averaging numbers finds the middle ground between two price points, and averaging impacts the average cost we want to determine. Let’s understand the effects of averaging in inventory prices and cost using the AVCO method.
When market prices rise, the average cost is lower than the actual price. This difference has several implications—lower average cost would mean lower cost of goods sold, higher net income, and higher income taxes. However, a low average cost would not affect the amount that we’ll pay to suppliers.
Below is a graph depicting the actual price of inventory vs the computed average cost.
Prices & Average Cost Relationship at Rising Prices
Touch the graph above to interact Click on the graphs above to interact
-
Price
-
Average Cost
Interact with the chart above and navigate around number 5. You’ll see that the actual price at this time is $170 and yet the average cost is only $90. We still have to pay $170 per unit to suppliers even though our costing is at $90.
Now let’s take a look at declining prices. It’s possible that prices of goods decline over time, which can be a good sign. However, it may also have effects under the AVCO method.
When prices decline, we expect the average cost to be higher than the actual price. A higher average cost would result in higher COGS, lower net income, and lower income taxes. While this is good because taxes are lower, it might not look good in the income statement.
Price & Average Cost Relationship at Declining Prices
Touch the graph above to interact Click on the graphs above to interact
-
Price
-
Average Cost
When prices fluctuate, the average cost method offsets the fluctuations and smooths out the price trend. It removes erratic changes and helps you to report COGS without sudden drops or shoot ups.
The graph below shows how AVCO can help with fluctuating prices:
Price & Average Cost Relationship at Fluctuating Prices
Touch the graph above to interact Click on the graphs above to interact
-
Price
-
Average Cost
The blue line is the actual price of goods. It’s erratic with very steep curves. But with AVCO (red line), the average cost is smooth. Small ups and downs don’t really matter since the deviation from the trend isn’t that significant.
Tip:
The less inventory you keep on hand, the closer your average cost of inventory will be to the current price of inventory.
How To Calculate Ending Inventory & COGS Using the Average Cost Method
Calculating the ending inventory is essential in inventory costing and management. It’s also a key element in determining the COGS. Calculating ending inventory and COGS under average cost method depends on the inventory system.
Let’s illustrate the AVCO method under the periodic and perpetual inventory system using the sample data below:
Beginning Inventory: 200 units at $20 each
Date | PURCHASES | Price |
---|---|---|
1/2 | 200 units @ $40 | $ 8,000 |
1/5 | 300 units @ $70 | 21,000 |
1/8 | 200 units @ $90 | 18,000 |
1/13 | 100 units @ $150 | 15,000 |
TOTAL | $ 62,000 |
Date | SALES |
---|---|
1/3 | 250 units |
1/6 | 245 units |
1/11 | 235 units |
In a periodic inventory system, all inventory purchases are initially recorded in the Purchases account, which substitutes for the COGS expense during the period. At the end of the period, a physical inventory count is performed and the costs in the Purchases account are separated between units sold (COGS) and units on hand (inventory) based on the average cost per unit during the period.
Under the perpetual inventory system, inventory records are maintained continuously throughout the accounting period. Whenever there’s a purchase or sale, inventory records are updated automatically. You can determine the running balance inventory under a perpetual inventory system easily without a physical count. Let’s see how the moving average method works with a perpetual inventory system.
You must perform the following steps for each inventory sale during the period or choose accounting software that will do it for you.
Comparison of Ending Inventory Balance Between Periodic and Perpetual AVCO
Since the perpetual inventory system uses a moving average, the ending balances reported under perpetual inventory can differ from periodic inventory.
Perpetual | Periodic | Effect | |
---|---|---|---|
Ending Inventory | $27,432 | $17,820 | Total current assets under the perpetual method is higher by $9,612. |
COGS | $38,568 | $48,180 | Net income under the periodic method is lower by $9,612. A higher COGS may reduce your taxable income. |
Cost per Unit | $101.60 | $66.00 | The difference of $35.6 between these method only shows how averaging affects (or somehow, distorts) the unit cost. |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
This method is popular because of its simplicity in computing unit cost. Unlike FIFO and LIFO, which determine the cost of each unit sold following assumptions about which units are sold first, the AVCO method simply uses the average unit purchase price as the cost for units sold.
All inventory cost flow assumptions have pros and cons. The average cost is not the best cost basis method—as there is really no best method. However, AVCO is the simplest and will usually generate the most stable unit cost of goods sold.
Bottom Line
The average cost method is a cost flow assumption that uses the averaging technique to smooth out price fluctuations and simplify costing. However, AVCO isn’t an ideal inventory costing formula for businesses that sell unrelated products. What we’ve discussed in this article is part of your small business bookkeeping. Don’t forget to conduct a physical count of inventory to verify the accuracy of your accounting records.