To find the best candidates for your company’s open roles, you can look internally or externally. Internal recruiting is when you fill an open position from within your current bank of employees—by promotion or transfer—while external recruiting entails posting job ads to hire a candidate that does not currently work for your company.
When considering internal vs external recruitment for your next hire, it is important to understand the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Hiring internally, for example, is cheaper, saves time, and can increase overall employee engagement. Hiring externally, on the other hand, opens your job search up to a multitude of candidates, which can result in higher-quality candidates. Keep in mind these two methods are not mutually exclusive; you may use one or the other at different times for different roles.
If you find that you are unable to recruit from within, consider using an external recruiting source, like ZipRecruiter, to help you find your next top candidate. With ZipRecruiter, you can follow your candidates through the entire hiring process—from applicant tracking to interviewing—starting at $16 per job post per day. Start now with a free trial, plus get an Exclusive Free Highlight Enhancement ($60 value) to help your posts stand out.
Internal recruiting can have several advantages. You already know the person’s work ethic and that they fit in with your company culture. They’re familiar with your company policies and will require less training on processes typically covered in new hire onboarding.
Internal recruitment may also boost employee morale. Your employees see firsthand that you value them and their contribution to your organization, even if you select someone else for the role. Besides that, letting an employee develop their career or putting them in a better-suited role can positively impact employee turnover.
If you have qualified candidates internally, there may be no reason for you to go through the extra steps of hiring from outside your organization. As such, hiring from within can be a quicker process—the average time to hire candidates internally is two to three weeks. However, there are also disadvantages, such as having a smaller pool of candidates and then having to fill in the position of the one shifting roles.
|Lower costs to hire||May miss out on highly qualified external candidates|
|Employee already has inside knowledge and experience with processes and procedures||Potential disappointment and disengagement from applicants not selected|
|Increases employee engagement||Have to backfill the selected employee’s previous role|
Internal recruitment costs are considerably less than those for external hiring, as you’ll be able to do away with many of the typical costs associated with the hiring process. You’ll also save a lot more time because you can focus on determining skills and qualifications rather than having to filter one’s culture fit. On top of all that, the overhead cost of any salary increase that you’ll provide an internal candidate is typically less than that of what you’d have to shell out for a new-hire.
Did You Know?:
Internal hiring can also save costs on salaries. Historically, studies have shown that new hires are paid more than promoted workers—an average of 18% more in a Wharton School study.
Internal Recruitment Methods
Internal recruiting focuses more on the job skills and requirements, whereas external recruiting will need to have more emphasis on your company.
There are three key ways internal hires make a move within your company:
- New Position
External recruiting is when you hire a new employee who does not currently work for you. This involves posting your job on a job board or finding your next hire at a career fair and will typically take around one to three months to do. However, depending on the skills you need for a particular role, it may take you much longer to fill the position.
This form of recruitment is a labor-intensive process. Although—or because—you get access to a limitless pool of candidates, it can take an immense amount of time to sort through them all. And you’re never completely sure you have made the right hiring decision until later down the line.
|Nearly limitless pool of candidates||You don’t know the employee’s work ethic|
|New hires can bring a refreshing change to companies||Existing employees may feel passed over and become resentful|
|May attract high-quality talent from competitors||New hire may have a larger learning curve than internal hire|
Did You Know?:
A recent Gallup study found that it took external hires a minimum of 12 months to fully integrate with their new company culture and hit “peak performance” in their role. This doesn’t mean you should avoid external candidates, but you should be prepared to give external hires substantial time to get comfortable in their new job.
The costs to hire externally vastly outweigh the costs to hire from within—ranging anywhere from $1,000 to over $5,000 per hire, in addition to the new hire’s salary amount. External recruitment costs can also rise depending on the complexity of the position.
External recruitment costs include
- Job board fees
- Sorting through applicants
- Holding multiple rounds of interviews
- Conducting prior employment and background screening
- Training and onboarding
- Compensation and benefits (including sign-on bonuses, if applicable)
External Recruitment Methods
There are many different ways to recruit for an external candidate, ranging from posting an ad on job boards to searching for candidates in career fairs.
With external recruitment, be sure to shift your job description slightly to better market your company and the role. External candidates may not be familiar with your company and will want to know what benefits you offer and why they should choose your organization as their employer.
If you need tools to help with external recruiting, check out our top recruitment software picks.
As with anything having to do with employees, job postings, interviewing, and hiring decisions, whether you hire internally or externally, you are subject to employment laws. Specifically, you cannot create a job posting or make an interview or hiring decision based on an applicant’s:
- National origin
- Military service
Federal law prohibits discrimination based on the above classes as this can lead to hiring bias. Some state laws go even further and prohibit discrimination based on a candidate’s appearance (e.g., tattoos and piercings) and marital status. Make sure you are adhering to federal law and any local employment laws applicable to your organization.
In your hiring efforts, you may find that for some positions, internal candidates offer what you need, creating a faster, smoother, and more cost-effective hiring process. For other positions, you may need to look outside your current employee group, which can bring new skills, experience, and ideas into your company. By understanding the differences between internal vs external recruiting, as well as each method’s advantages and disadvantages, you can take the most efficient approach for finding employees you’ll love.